As an incredibly nosy person, I’m a big fan of knowing what is going on in the world. As such, I spend an inordinate amount of time reading various news websites. Being UK based, my main reading material used to be that provided by the BBC.
Now, a level of bias is always to be expected here, given that the BBC is a state run corporation. However, their bias over recent months has reached new extremes. More and more, I’ve found myself reading websites from further afield just to try and get an un-jaundiced view on what is actually happening around the world.
The BBC isn’t the only news source guilty of this. I’ve taken to reading news sites from around the world with a pretty even mix of left-wing and right-wing bias, with the theory in mind that if I take on board what both say, I can look at the middle ground and figure out what is actually happening that way. I do not think this is a good thing. You’re left with the feeling that you can’t really trust what is being reported on what should be a respectable outlet of information. It’s even worse when that feeling is proven with minimal internet searching.
It’s a pretty sorry state of affairs that I’ve concluded that the most unbiased source of information is RT.com (Russia Today).
Now, I get why this is the case. With current events as they are, there is a very genuine concern about a backlash happening against certain cultures. That said, I’m not sure that misreporting events, or flat out not reporting events, is the way to prevent this happening. I’m pretty sure that those who would be involved in such a backlash gave up reading media from the likes of the BBC a long time ago *because* of their current style of reporting.
The bias isn’t the only problem I have, though. In a culture where breaking news from across the world can be an instant thing, the ‘on’ switch is glued down. If there is currently nothing happening, interviews are conducted just to gain soundbites that can be misquoted again and again out of context. If there is no one relevant to the event to interview, Random Joe off the street is pulled aside to give his views on the event.
Now, call me whatever you want – but I’m not all too interested in what Random Joe off the street has to say. All I actually want to know is very simple – what happened, why it happened, and what is happening as a result of what happened. Random Joe off the street is unlikely to know this. If I want to know what Random Joe thinks, I can just search the most popular tag on twitter, and find out that way.
While I’m having a bit of a rant about this, I may as well add – I don’t care if a dog can skateboard while performing back flips. This should not be a front page thing unless you are having a *really* slow news day. Stop it.
So, to sum up – it’s pretty much as the title of this post states. I’d like my news unbiased, and to stick to actual news, please.